What Does It Mean By ‘Being Buddhist’

Yesterday was a sleepless night. Not because i was thinking of something or i had any bad dream. I was trying to sleep but the sound of beating drum disturbs me each time. It was Jagran-Gondhal’s program (praying god by singing songs for whole night) at our neighbour’s house that didn’t let me sleep.
Our neighbour Mr. X (Identity should be hidden) is a Buddhist. I was thinking at first that Mr. X should not follow the custom of Jagran-Gondhal, because it is a Hindu’s custom and Mr.X is a Buddhist. How many people there who follows other religions’ rituals? I think mostly very few. These are two totally different things i.e. to participate in the ritual of the other religion and to follow or observe it by own. How many people observe the fast of Roja apart from Muslim brothers? How many people celebrate Christmas apart from Christians? How many people are there who don’t eat non-vegetables in Shravan apart from Hindu brothers?  As I have said above getting participate for the sake of brotherhood or enjoyment and observing it, are totally different things. Being a Buddhist I really get shocked as Buddhism has not rooted yet in the minds of (new) Buddhists, after more than fifty eight years,
I remember the poem of T. S. Eliot ‘The Journey of Magi’. It describes the duel in the minds of the three Magi who have changed their old religion and became Christens. It is not the case with (converted) Christens only but it is a worldwide crisis. Conversion is of not only religion but beliefs also. In India most of the conversions occurred because of the people from lower castes get tired of the exploitation and inequalities in the Hindu religion. Christens, Shikhs, Jain, Muslims and off course Buddhists are the examples of the conversion. Mostly downtrodden people have got converted. The reason may be good life or equal opportunities or want of equal status. The reasons are various.
Now comparing with other four religions or better to say, as Indian constitution named them, Minorities, Buddhist are supposed to be the least developed or Buddhism is least propagated religion. I mean followers of the Buddhism are not following it the way it has to be followed. Making it simple, Buddhists do not behave like the ideal Buddhists. They are Buddhists-cum-Hindus or Buddhists-cum-Hindus-cum-Muslims-cum-Christens. Some are partially Buddhists for the sake of marriage and mostly Hindus- from where they ‘released’ (came). Some are still totally Hindus except on the caste certificates.
I think though we have converted in 1956 from Hindu-Mahar, mostly in Maharashtra, we still are caged in the same identity. We cannot blame anybody for not being come forth and teach us how to behave. Now-a-days and many years the rationalist are converting into Buddhism. It is daily news of conversion to Buddhism from all over India. Not only lower classes but Brahmnis, Vaishya, Kshtriyas and many other backward classes are converting to Buddhism. As I said we are living in the cage; cage of old identity that is of Hindu-Mahar. First of all we have to break that cage and emancipate ourselves from the old religion. though most of us have done this job, its their duty to make others free. I know changing beliefs is not an easy task.
In Maharashtra ‘The Buddhist Society’ is one of the leading institutions to teach and propagate Buddhism. Many other institutions are working in the same direction, but it is not enough. Most Buddhists are behaving the same way as they were before 1956. The only change that has occurred is in the Caste certificates. Let’s now discuss what it means by being Buddhist
Buddhism is not anti- phenomenon to any religion. I mean to say that it is not anti-Hindu or anti-Muslim or contrast to any religion. It has its own philosophy and own way and norms. If somebody says he is Buddhist that means he is a humanitarian. Humanitarianism is concept we can compare for them who don’t have any idea of Buddhism. There is no such thing as dogmatism, orthodox or better to say ‘Kattarpanthi’ in Buddhism. Because it is totally depend on the follower about what to follow and what not to. Lord Buddha doesn’t ever compel or affirm that what he said is universal truth (actually it is). HE gives total liberation to human being to think on his preaching that is DHAMMA and the follow it. Don’t ever follow it blindly. We can compare Dhamma with science which is always changing as everything does. HE has put forth the theories of human behaviour as the science has put forth any Law e.g. Law of Gravitation. So read it, think of it, follow it; if you get the unexpected results deny it. Just don’t follow or don’t believe anything blindly.  
In short we can say that being scientific is Being Buddhist. Being Buddhist is not just following Buddhism; it is respecting all other religions. It is not just wearing white cloths; it’s about having clean character. It is not just taking the blue flag; it’s about assuming and treating everybody equal. It is not just about knowing Buddhism; it’s about following it

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relationship in Lockdown

some unpublished Love poems

तु-- कविता